Is Deepseek Better Than ChatGPT?
DeepSeek has been gaining remarkable popularity lately. Could it be a better alternative to ChatGPT? This article offers an in-depth comparison of the two
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b44be/b44be8b956be8c35cc374a99fdba40f1a651da78" alt="Is Deepseek Better Than ChatGPT?"
Recently, DeepSeek has rapidly become the talk of the AI world—sparking widespread discussions and emerging as a dark horse that has captured the attention of both industry experts and users. Even OpenAI CEO Sam Altman took to Twitter to commend DeepSeek, describing its balance of performance and pricing as “impressive.”
So, what is DeepSeek’s true potential? Can it outperform ChatGPT in a head-to-head showdown? In this article, we’ll dive deep into a comparison between DeepSeek and ChatGPT, exploring aspects such as model capabilities, pricing structures, user experience, and application scenarios. Our goal is to give you a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of both AI models, so you can choose the one that best fits your needs.
What is DeepSeek?
DeepSeek is an open-source language model built on efficient computation and transparent reasoning capabilities. It delivers robust AI solutions with exceptional cost-effectiveness. Not only is it an emerging contender in the AI arena, but its impressive performance and openness have also quickly drawn the attention of developers and enterprises.
Compared to other language models, DeepSeek offers several key advantages:
-
Breakthrough Computational Efficiency at Minimal Cost
DeepSeek has disrupted the industry. While companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic have invested billions in training their AI models, DeepSeek R1 was developed for only $6 million—and it was trained using older-generation chips. Despite these modest resources, it excels in both problem-solving speed and accuracy, making it a highly competitive option for those seeking efficient, low-cost AI solutions. -
Transparent Reasoning Process
DeepSeek provides a clear, traceable chain of logic during its reasoning process, allowing users to understand the basis of its outputs. In contrast, models like OpenAI’s GPT series are often criticized as “black boxes” with opaque decision-making processes. For applications that require explainable AI, DeepSeek offers a significant advantage. -
Balanced Creativity and Logical Prowess
In comparative tests against the GPT-4 series, DeepSeek has demonstrated consistently stable performance across problem-solving, creative writing, and ethical reasoning tasks. This balance makes it not only suitable for technical applications but also an excellent tool for content creators. -
Open-Source Freedom and Flexible Customization
One of DeepSeek’s standout features is its fully open-source nature. Unlike proprietary models such as Claude, Gemini, and the GPT series, DeepSeek allows developers to freely access its code, modify its architecture, and optimize it deeply according to their own needs. This transparency fosters innovation within the AI ecosystem and gives users greater control over the technology.
Is DeepSeek Better Than ChatGPT?
DeepSeek currently offers two models: DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1. DeepSeek-R1 is a reasoning model comparable to the gpt-o series, while DeepSeek-V3 is a generation model similar to the gpt-4 series. In our comparison, we’ll pit DeepSeek-V3 against ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 against gpt-o3.
DeepSeek-V3 vs ChatGPT-4o
Benchmark (Metric) | DeepSeek V3 | GPT-4o |
---|---|---|
Architecture | MoE | - |
# Activated Params | 37B | - |
# Total Params | 671B | - |
English | ||
MMLU (EM) | 88.5 | 87.2 |
MMLU-Redux (EM) | 89.1 | 88.0 |
MMLU-Pro (EM) | 75.9 | 72.6 |
DROP (3-shot F1) | 91.6 | 83.7 |
IF-Eval (Prompt Strict) | 86.1 | 84.3 |
GPQA-Diamond (Pass@1) | 59.1 | 49.9 |
SimpleQA (Correct) | 24.9 | 38.2 |
FRAMES (Acc.) | 73.3 | 80.5 |
LongBench v2 (Acc.) | 48.7 | 48.1 |
Code | ||
HumanEval-Mul (Pass@1) | 82.6 | 80.5 |
LiveCodeBench (Pass@1-COT) | 40.5 | 33.4 |
LiveCodeBench (Pass@1) | 37.6 | 34.2 |
Codeforces (Percentile) | 51.6 | 23.6 |
SWE Verified (Resolved) | 42.0 | 38.8 |
Aider-Edit (Acc.) | 79.7 | 72.9 |
Aider-Polyglot (Acc.) | 49.6 | 16.0 |
Math | ||
AIME 2024 (Pass@1) | 39.2 | 9.3 |
MATH-500 (EM) | 90.2 | 74.6 |
CNMO 2024 (Pass@1) | 43.2 | 10.8 |
Chinese | ||
CLUEWSC (EM) | 90.9 | 87.9 |
C-Eval (EM) | 86.5 | 76.0 |
C-SimpleQA (Correct) | 64.1 | 59.3 |
Based on the comparison data, DeepSeek V3 demonstrates outstanding performance across several key areas, particularly in mathematics, programming, and Chinese language processing—surpassing even GPT-4o. This indicates that DeepSeek V3 possesses superior model capabilities, providing users with a higher-quality AI generation experience.
DeepSeek-R1 vs GPT-03
Benchmark (Metric) | OpenAI o1-mini | DeepSeek R1 |
---|---|---|
Architecture | - | MoE |
# Activated Params | - | 37B |
# Total Params | - | 671B |
English | ||
MMLU (Pass@1) | 85.2 | 90.8 |
MMLU-Redux (EM) | 86.7 | 92.9 |
MMLU-Pro (EM) | 80.3 | 84.0 |
DROP (3-shot F1) | 83.9 | 92.2 |
IF-Eval (Prompt Strict) | 84.8 | 83.3 |
GPQA-Diamond (Pass@1) | 60.0 | 71.5 |
SimpleQA (Correct) | 7.0 | 30.1 |
FRAMES (Acc.) | 76.9 | 82.5 |
AlpacaEval2.0 (LC-winrate) | 57.8 | 87.6 |
ArenaHard (GPT-4-1106) | 92.0 | 92.3 |
Code | ||
LiveCodeBench (Pass@1-COT) | 53.8 | 65.9 |
Codeforces (Percentile) | 93.4 | 96.3 |
Codeforces (Rating) | 1820 | 2029 |
SWE Verified (Resolved) | 41.6 | 49.2 |
Aider-Polyglot (Acc.) | 32.9 | 53.3 |
Math | ||
AIME 2024 (Pass@1) | 63.6 | 79.8 |
MATH-500 (Pass@1) | 90.0 | 97.3 |
CNMO 2024 (Pass@1) | 67.6 | 78.8 |
Chinese | ||
CLUEWSC (EM) | 89.9 | 92.8 |
C-Eval (EM) | 68.9 | 91.8 |
C-SimpleQA (Correct) | 40.3 | 63.7 |
DeepSeek R1 outperforms o1-mini overall, with notable strengths in coding, mathematics, and Chinese language comprehension. It is particularly well-suited for tasks related to these domains, whereas o1-mini remains competitive in certain English-language evaluations.
DeepSeek is currently available for free
Both DeepSeek and ChatGPT offer free access to users. However, OpenAI imposes certain usage limits on free users and provides paid subscription plans—Plus at $20/month and Pro at $200/month. In contrast, DeepSeek currently offers more free resources and has yet to introduce any paid plans.
How is the user experience of DeepSeek?
DeepSeek boasts powerful natural language processing capabilities and supports independent local deployment, offering greater flexibility and data security. Below is a brief overview based on actual user experience:
-
Open-Source Model with Independent Deployment
DeepSeek provides downloadable open-source models, allowing users to run inference tasks locally or on self-hosted servers. This is a significant advantage for developers seeking greater control over data privacy, security, and performance optimization. Unlike cloud-based API models, local deployment eliminates network latency issues and enables fine-tuning of model parameters to meet specific business needs. -
Free to Use, but Requires a Chinese Phone Number for Registration
DeepSeek’s online inference service is currently free, lowering the barrier for developers. However, registration requires a mainland China phone number for verification, which may be inconvenient for international users or those reluctant to share their phone numbers. This limitation could impact DeepSeek’s global adoption and user growth. -
Chain of Thought (COT) Reasoning for a Superior Experience
DeepSeek supports Chain of Thought (COT) reasoning, meaning it reveals its step-by-step thought process when solving problems rather than just providing an answer. This feature is particularly valuable for mathematical reasoning, complex logic analysis, and code generation, allowing users to understand the AI’s decision-making path and increasing trust in its responses. Notably, this capability has also influenced OpenAI to further enhance transparency in its models. -
Service Stability Issues
Users have occasionally reported service downtime, indicating that DeepSeek still needs to improve its availability and reliability. Strengthening service stability will be crucial for its long-term success.
How to use DeepSeek in ChatofAI?
ChatofAI now supports the DeepSeek model, allowing you to use it seamlessly within the platform.
To enable DeepSeek in ChatofAI:
- Go to the Bot Management page.
- Click Settings → General → Large Language Model.
- Select DEEP_SEEK_CHAT to activate the DeepSeek model.
DeepSeek
About ChatofAI
ChatofAI is an AI chatbot that can be easily integrated into your website or messaging
platform. It can respond based on your custom knowledge base, making it ideal for
customer support, FAQs, and knowledge-sharing scenarios. Try it out today!
More Articles
The Best Free ChatGPT Alternatives in 2024
Looking for free ChatGPT alternatives? Here are the best free ChatGPT alternatives in 2024 that you can use to generate text, chat with AI, and more.
August 12, 2024
Enhancing Your Website's User Experience with AI Chatbots: A Beginner's Guide
This guide introduces beginners to using AI chatbots on websites to improve user experience, offering insights on benefits, setup, and successful applications.
November 7, 2024